Days-to-Exit — can you actually sell?

Most frozen — you're stuck

The 15 tokens where the sell queue would take the longest real buying to clear. A large overhang with almost no absorption means an exit could take years, if it clears at all.

Most liquid — you could actually exit

The 15 tokens with the shortest Days-to-Exit and a real near-market queue (≥ $50 of standing near-market sell orders). These clear fastest — but read "fastest" as days, not seconds.

By platform

Median Days-to-Exit and the share of frozen tokens, per issuer whose order books settle where we can read them on-chain.

Methodology

Verbatim, as recorded in the daily build:

Days-to-Exit = near-market sell overhang / real absorption rate. Overhang = tokens listed for sale at or below the clearing price x 1.25 (near-market only, so aspirational/face-value asks that sit a median of ~200% above the clearing price are excluded). Absorption = tokens actually bought per day over a trailing 90-day window (widened to 180 days when fewer than 3 fills, so one stray trade cannot define the rate); we use mean throughput because these tokens trade on only a few days per quarter, making a daily median uninformative. Days-to-Exit is the days of real buying needed to clear the queue ahead of a new seller. Tiers: liquid <=30d, thin 30-120d (also tokens with no standing queue but real trading: not stuck, but thin), illiquid 120-365d, frozen >365d or zero absorption in 180d (no buyer). Score 0-100 is banded to the tier. HONESTY: this is a structurally illiquid asset class - median absorption is ~$1/day - so 'liquid' means liquid RELATIVE to tokenized real estate, a ranking of exit difficulty, not equity-grade liquidity. primaryPressureX (issuer direct-sale tokens / secondary absorption over the window) is a separate documented modifier applied only as a small, band-capped score penalty; it never changes Days-to-Exit or the tier. Limitations: overhang omits far-above-market listings; mean absorption can be lifted by a single large fill (see fillsInWindow); Days-to-Exit counts only the queue ahead, not the seller's own position size. Anchored to the data frontier for idempotency.

In plain English. We look at what is actually for sale near today's clearing price (the overhang), and how fast tokens are really being bought (absorption, averaged over a trailing window so one stray trade can't define the rate). Dividing one by the other gives the days of genuine buying needed to clear the line ahead of a new seller. A short number means a queue that clears; a huge number — or none at all — means you would be waiting.

Honest limitations. Tokenized real estate is a structurally illiquid asset class: median absorption is on the order of ~$1/day. So "liquid" here means liquid relative to other tokenized property, not liquid like a listed stock. The overhang deliberately ignores far-above-market "face value" asks that no one is hitting; a single large fill can flatter the absorption rate (see the fills-in-window column); and Days-to-Exit counts only the queue ahead of you, not the size of your own position. Read it as a ranking of exit difficulty, not a promise of an exit.

Full formulas and contract addresses on the methodology page.

Citation & sources

Free to use with attribution. Please cite:

EstateFi Days-to-Exit — EstateFi, estatefi.io — retrieved 2026-07-23

Source: EstateFi — estatefi.io. Recomputed daily from public-blockchain order books and trades. Last generated 2026-07-23.