Is the lock real? Token unlocks, verified on-chain

Per-token forensic verdicts

The bar shows how the examined allocation splits between enforced, discretionary and unverifiable. "On-chain movable" = total supply − tokens provably inside enforced locks; it is a capacity figure (what could legally move today), never a prediction.

Out of scope — shown for honesty, not verified

Our engine reads Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism. These well-known unlocks live on chains we cannot read, so we make no forensic claim about them — verifying a promise we can't read would betray the whole point.

On a chain we do read, but with no publicly-labelled team/investor/vesting addresses to check — so there is nothing for us to classify:

Methodology & honesty

How we classify. For each allocation address we run eth_getCode: an empty response means a plain wallet (EOA) — nothing on-chain restricts transfer. Where there is contract code, we probe function selectors to recognise the interface: start() + duration() + beneficiary() for an OpenZeppelin VestingWallet (schedule-enforced); getThreshold() + getOwners() for a Gnosis Safe multisig (discretionary — signers can move funds at any block); owner() with no vesting selector for an owner-controlled reserve/treasury/timelock (discretionary). A contract matching no known interface is reported Unverifiable — we refuse to award "enforced" without a chain-checkable basis. We bias toward not claiming enforcement: a false "discretionary" is safe, a false "enforced" is brand-lethal.

The guardrails, as recorded in the daily build:

A movement is described mechanically — "held in an EOA", "balance fell from X to Y", "no vesting contract found" — and never as intent: we do not publish "dumped", "rugged" or "scammed". · Absence of a flag is NOT a clean bill of health: our CEX/bridge label list is incomplete and drifts, our pre-dump scan uses a shallow recent-block window that deepens over time, and we only see the chains we index — tokens bridged elsewhere or moved on a CEX internal ledger are invisible. · Enforced today ≠ enforced tomorrow: an upgradeable or owner-mutable vesting contract can be changed, so a green verdict is a statement about the contract as it stands today.

Incomplete by nature — CEX/bridge addresses rotate; used only to LABEL a movement, never to assert intent. A transfer to one of these addresses is not proof of a sale; it can be custody migration, staking, collateral, or an internal move. Absence of a match here is NOT evidence tokens stayed put — it only means we did not recognize the counterparty from these public sources.

Full method and contract addresses on the methodology page.

Citation & sources

Free to use with attribution. Please cite:

EstateFi Unlock Truth — on-chain token-lock verification — estatefi.io — retrieved 2026-07-29

Source: EstateFi — estatefi.io. Every number is read from a public blockchain and recomputed daily; where the chain is silent we say "unverifiable", loudly. Last generated 2026-07-29.